Subject	Personally, VR-4's aren't my cup-o-tea...>>>
Posted by	Michael(Dallas) on December 25, 2001 at 9:27 PM
	This message has been viewed 39 times.
In Reply To	Re: let me bust it down some for you posted by 2Boost on December 25, 2001 at 06:53 PM
Message	nothing against it, but it just looks too much like a toy, especially earlier models. The AWD is good. The 4WS is good. But... The active aero stuff is cheesy. The FWD base models is cheesy. The bolt-on plastic rocker panels is cheesy. The faux side-air dams is cheesy. The faux rear bumper air diffuser in late models is cheesy. The Supra-like spoiler in late models is cheesy. All of this tells me that Mitsubishi wasn't serious about their sports/GT car offering and that they just were in it for the buck. Nonetheless, to address your comment, how do you know that combination will give you 400 crank hp? How many VR-4's have been dynoed stateside? Cheers! Michael.
Follow Ups	How good is the Supra MKIV turbo? Does it have better ...... - ChristianZ 17:54:10 12/25/01 90-100mph is the same in a Z as it is in a Supra (n/m) - sbsTT(MD) 17:58:32 12/25/01 I'm sorry what I meant was can you tell that you're going to - ChristianZ 18:03:52 12/25/01 stock it will be to close to call, feel wise ZTT seems> - RT 18:49:00 12/25/01 Re: stock it will be to close to call, feel wise ZTT seems> - 2Boost 19:29:13 12/25/01 from what i have read stock TT z and TT supra not 1.5 sec>> - RT 20:15:50 12/25/01 Re: actually I was wrong, the Supra is 1.7 sec faster >>> - 2Boost 21:07:10 12/25/01 That can't be right > - kZtt 22:15:47 12/25/01 give it a little 1/4 mile room.... they typically trap 106 (n/m) - CarlCuro (busted...again) 22:37:53 12/25/01 That still doesn't account for the time. Has to be misprint (n/m) - DamonH 90TT 02:29:30 12/26/01 At that speed it would be over 200ft ahead LOL misprint (n/m) - RT 11:37:52 12/26/01 let me bust it down some for you - genic 18:05:15 12/25/01 I wouldn't call the 3si a 'nice' overall build - BDz32 (FL) 18:11:48 12/25/01 my limited knowledge of them (n/m) - genic 18:15:56 12/25/01 and there transfer case, it's known to shot crap out - HaloZ² 20:24:23 12/25/01 Very accurate view of Supra vs Z (n/m) - dlaw300z(NA=turd, need a TT) 18:39:01 12/25/01 Re: let me bust it down some for you - 2Boost 18:53:31 12/25/01 refer to - genic 18:55:39 12/25/01 but it has 25-30 % drivetrain loss. - HaloZ² 20:33:07 12/25/01 Re: but it has 25-30 % drivetrain loss. - 2Boost 21:15:55 12/25/01 are your comparing 1.5k in mods vs 3k in mods? troll - HaloZ² 04:59:40 12/26/01 Personally, VR-4's aren't my cup-o-tea...>>> - Michael(Dallas) 21:27:03 12/25/01 BTW the reason I'm asking is mt Ztt was stolen December 23rd - ChristianZ 18:11:01 12/25/01 Sh*t! This is the umpteenth post of Z's >>> - Quiki 19:03:28 12/25/01 4 time Z owner... If I had it to do again... - wildestyet 20:42:39 12/25/01 Stock Ztt and supra TT almost dead even cars. Supra >> - RT 18:19:49 12/25/01 Stop spewing this utter bullshit - Jack B. 20:50:33 12/25/01 2nd that, I've seen 309rwhp.. bone stock, '93.5 6Spd TT. (n/m) - Brad (JSpecZ32) 21:45:19 12/25/01 We are talking real world 1/4 mile not dyno sheet>> - RT 22:00:58 12/25/01 Being the stage II addict you are, you'd think you'd know. - DamonH 90TT 19:39:04 12/25/01 The reason I asked this Damon is because my friggin' car got - ChristianZ 01:25:08 12/26/01 I responded to your email. (n/m) - DamonH 90TT 02:26:44 12/26/01 My take...>>> - Michael(Dallas) 21:15:24 12/25/01 Re: that was a good analysis.. and I'd add that >> - 2Boost 21:22:21 12/25/01 yes, a good comparison, may I add >> - Quiki 21:33:54 12/25/01 I see you're running 19degrees of timing... - Brad (JSpecZ32) 21:57:48 12/25/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.